Solving A System Of Equations: A Step-by-Step Guide

by TextBrain Team 52 views

Hey guys! Today, we're diving into the exciting world of mathematics to tackle a system of equations. Specifically, we'll be breaking down how to solve the following system, which looks a bit tricky but is totally manageable when we approach it step by step:

  • x + √y = 18
  • √x + y = 8

Where x and y are integers. This means we are looking for whole number solutions, which simplifies our task quite a bit. So, grab your thinking caps, and let's get started!

Understanding the Problem

Before we jump into solving, it’s super important to understand what we’re dealing with. We have two equations, and each equation has two variables, x and y. The key here is that these equations are linked – the same values of x and y need to work for both equations. Also, the presence of square roots adds a little twist, but don’t worry, we'll handle it! Remember, we're looking for integer solutions, meaning x and y must be whole numbers (…-2, -1, 0, 1, 2…). This significantly narrows down the possibilities and makes our job easier. Thinking about the constraints right from the start is a smart move in problem-solving. Recognizing that we need integers means we can rule out a whole bunch of potential solutions that might work if we were dealing with real numbers in general.

When faced with a system of equations, it’s like having a puzzle where you need to find the pieces that fit together perfectly. Each equation gives you a clue, and our job is to use these clues to figure out what x and y are. The presence of square roots might make it seem intimidating, but it just means we'll need to use some clever algebraic techniques to get rid of them. We'll likely need to isolate the square roots and then square both sides of the equations, which is a standard method for dealing with this kind of problem. But before we dive into the algebra, let's take a moment to think about the kind of numbers we might be looking for. Since we're dealing with square roots and we need integer solutions, it's a good idea to consider perfect squares – numbers like 1, 4, 9, 16, and so on. This is because the square root of a perfect square is an integer, which will make our calculations much cleaner. This strategic thinking can save us a lot of time and effort in the long run. By focusing on perfect squares, we can make educated guesses and potentially skip over many fruitless calculations. This is a key skill in mathematics – not just blindly applying formulas, but also thinking about the nature of the problem and using that to guide your approach.

Isolating the Square Roots

Okay, so the first thing we want to do is isolate the square root terms in each equation. This means getting the √y on its own in the first equation and the √x on its own in the second equation. Let’s rewrite the equations to do this:

  1. From x + √y = 18, we get √y = 18 - x
  2. From √x + y = 8, we get √x = 8 - y

Now, we have the square roots nicely isolated. This is a crucial step because it sets us up for the next move, which is squaring both sides. When you have a square root in an equation, squaring it is often the way to go to get rid of the root and simplify things. Isolating the term is essential because it ensures that when we square both sides, we're only squaring the square root term on one side of the equation. If we didn't isolate it first, we'd end up with more complicated expressions involving cross-terms, which would make the algebra much messier.

Think of it like peeling an onion – we're trying to get to the core of the problem by removing the outer layers. In this case, the square roots are like those outer layers, and isolating them is the first step in peeling them away. It's also important to remember that when we square both sides of an equation, we're essentially saying that if two things are equal, then their squares are also equal. This is a fundamental principle of algebra, but it's one that's worth keeping in mind to make sure we're not making any invalid steps. Now that we have the square roots isolated, we're in a much better position to move forward and find those integer solutions we're looking for. We've taken a potentially scary problem and broken it down into a more manageable form, which is a key strategy in problem-solving. Remember, the goal isn't just to find the answer, but also to understand the process and develop skills that we can apply to other problems.

Squaring Both Sides

Now comes the fun part – squaring both sides of our modified equations! This will eliminate the square roots and give us equations that are easier to work with. So, let's do it:

  1. Squaring √y = 18 - x gives us y = (18 - x)²
  2. Squaring √x = 8 - y gives us x = (8 - y)²

Awesome! We've gotten rid of the square roots. Notice how squaring both sides transformed the equations. What were once square root terms are now simple squares, which are much easier to manipulate algebraically. This is a common technique in solving equations involving radicals – get the radical by itself and then square (or cube, etc., depending on the root) both sides. This step is critical because it allows us to move from a world of square roots to a world of polynomials, which we have a lot more tools for dealing with.

However, a word of caution is in order here. When we square both sides of an equation, we can sometimes introduce extraneous solutions – solutions that satisfy the squared equation but not the original equation. This happens because squaring can make two unequal numbers equal (e.g., squaring -2 and 2 both gives 4). So, it's essential that we check our solutions at the end to make sure they work in the original equations. This is a crucial step that many people forget, leading to incorrect answers. Think of it like this: squaring is like opening a door to potential solutions, but we need to make sure that the solutions that come through the door are actually the ones we want. So, keep that in mind as we continue with the problem. Now that we have our squared equations, we can start to see a path towards solving for x and y. We have two equations, two unknowns, and no more square roots – things are looking good! The next step will involve substituting one equation into the other, which is a standard technique for solving systems of equations.

Substitution and Simplification

We now have two equations:

  1. y = (18 - x)²
  2. x = (8 - y)²

A classic move in solving systems of equations is substitution. We can substitute the first equation into the second (or vice versa) to eliminate one variable. Let's substitute the first equation into the second. This means we'll replace the 'y' in the second equation with '(18 - x)²'. This might look a bit scary, but trust me, it’ll work out. Here we go:

x = [8 - (18 - x)²]²

Okay, that looks…intense! But don't panic. We've just taken a big step towards solving the problem. What we've done is create a single equation with only one variable, x. This means we can (at least in theory) solve for x. The downside is that this equation looks pretty complicated, but we'll break it down step by step. Substitution is a powerful technique in solving systems of equations because it allows us to reduce the problem to a single equation in a single variable. This is a major simplification, even if the resulting equation looks intimidating.

Think of it like simplifying a complex recipe. You might start with a long list of ingredients and instructions, but by combining certain ingredients and following the instructions carefully, you can eventually reduce it to a single, delicious dish. In the same way, we're taking a complex system of equations and, through substitution, reducing it to a single equation that we can hopefully solve. Now, the next step is to simplify this equation. This will likely involve expanding the squared terms, which will result in a polynomial equation. Polynomial equations can be tricky to solve, but we have a lot of tools at our disposal, such as factoring, the quadratic formula, and numerical methods. The key is to be patient and methodical, and to take things one step at a time. Don't try to do too much in your head – write everything down and check your work carefully. Math is like a careful dance – each step needs to be precise and deliberate. So, let's take a deep breath and get ready to expand and simplify this equation. It might take a few steps, but we'll get there!

Let’s simplify this beast. First, let's expand the inner square (18 - x)²:

(18 - x)² = 18² - 2 * 18 * x + x² = 324 - 36x + x²

Now substitute this back into our equation:

x = [8 - (324 - 36x + x²)]²

Simplify inside the brackets:

x = (8 - 324 + 36x - x²)²

x = (-316 + 36x - x²)²

Okay, we've made some progress, but we still have a squared term to deal with. Expanding this will give us a quartic equation (an equation with x to the power of 4), which can be quite challenging to solve directly. However, let's not lose heart. We've simplified things as much as we can for now, and we're in a better position to see what our options are. Expanding the squares was a necessary step to simplify the equation and get rid of the parentheses. It's like untangling a knot – you need to carefully work through the strands to see how they connect.

At this point, we might be tempted to just keep expanding and simplifying, but it's always a good idea to pause and think about what we're doing. We have a quartic equation, which can be difficult to solve analytically. However, we also have an important piece of information that we haven't fully used yet: the fact that x and y are integers. This means that we don't need to find all possible solutions to the equation – we only need to find the integer solutions. This greatly simplifies the problem. We can use this information to our advantage by looking for integer values of x that might satisfy the equation. One way to do this is to try plugging in some small integer values and see if they work. This might seem like a brute-force approach, but it can be very effective, especially when we know that we're only looking for integer solutions. So, let's take a step back and think about how we can use this integer constraint to our advantage.

Using the Integer Constraint and Trial and Error

Since x and y are integers, this dramatically narrows down our options. We know that √x and √y must also be integers (because if they weren't, adding them to other integers wouldn't result in an integer). This gives us a crucial clue! Let's think about what values of x and y would make √x and √y integers. We're talking about perfect squares, right? Numbers like 0, 1, 4, 9, 16, 25, and so on.

Now, let's go back to our equations:

  1. √y = 18 - x
  2. √x = 8 - y

Since √y is an integer, (18 - x) must also be an integer. And since √x is an integer, (8 - y) must also be an integer. This is super helpful! The integer constraint has transformed our problem from a potentially messy algebraic equation into a more manageable number theory problem. We're now thinking about which integer values of x and y will make the square roots integers, which is a much simpler question to answer.

This is a great example of how understanding the problem and using all the information given can lead to a more elegant solution. We could have continued down the path of expanding the quartic equation, but that would have been a lot more work. By focusing on the integer constraint, we've found a much more direct route to the answer. Now, let's start trying some values. We can start with small perfect squares and see if they fit. For example, what if x = 0? Then √x = 0, and from the second equation, 8 - y = 0, so y = 8. Let's plug these values into the first equation to check if they work. √y = √8, which is not an integer, so x = 0 and y = 8 is not a solution. This is a good reminder that we need to check our solutions in the original equations to make sure they're valid.

Let's try another value. How about x = 16? Then √x = 4, and from the second equation, 8 - y = 4, so y = 4. Now, let's plug these into the first equation: 16 + √4 = 16 + 2 = 18. This works! So, x = 16 and y = 4 is a solution. We've found a solution! This is a fantastic feeling, and it's a testament to the power of careful thinking and systematic trial and error. We could stop here, but it's always a good idea to see if there are any other solutions. So, let's keep going and see what else we can find.

Finding the Solution

Let's continue our trial-and-error approach, keeping in mind that we're looking for perfect square values for x and y. We already found one solution (x=16, y=4). Let's organize our thoughts a bit. We have:

  1. √y = 18 - x
  2. √x = 8 - y

We know x and y must be non-negative (because of the square roots) and integers. Also, since √y = 18 - x, x cannot be greater than 18. Similarly, since √x = 8 - y, y cannot be greater than 8. This gives us a range of possible values to test, which is very helpful. Organizing our thoughts and setting bounds on the possible values is a key strategy in problem-solving. It helps us to focus our efforts and avoid wasting time on values that are unlikely to work.

Think of it like searching for a lost item in your house. If you just start randomly looking everywhere, you might never find it. But if you think about where you last saw it, and then systematically search those areas, you're much more likely to succeed. In the same way, by setting bounds on the possible values of x and y, we're narrowing down our search area and making it more likely that we'll find all the solutions. Let's continue our search. We've already tried x = 0 and x = 16. What about x = 1? If x = 1, then √x = 1, and from the second equation, 8 - y = 1, so y = 7. Plugging these into the first equation, we get 1 + √7 = 18, which is not true since √7 is not an integer. So, this is not a solution. Let's try x = 4. If x = 4, then √x = 2, and from the second equation, 8 - y = 2, so y = 6. Plugging these into the first equation, we get 4 + √6 = 18, which is also not true since √6 is not an integer.

We're making progress by systematically testing values and eliminating possibilities. This is a key part of the scientific method – you form a hypothesis, test it, and then revise your hypothesis based on the results. In this case, our hypothesis is that certain values of x and y will satisfy the equations, and we're testing that hypothesis by plugging them into the equations. So far, we've only found one solution, but we're not giving up! Let's keep going and see if we can find any others. It's important to be persistent and methodical in problem-solving. Sometimes the solution is right around the corner, and you just need to keep trying different approaches until you find it.

After trying a few more values, we'll find that there are no other integer solutions that satisfy both equations. Therefore, the only solution to the system is:

  • x = 16
  • y = 4

Checking the Solution

It’s super important to check our solution in the original equations to make sure we didn’t make any mistakes along the way, especially since we squared both sides earlier. Let’s plug x = 16 and y = 4 into the original equations:

  1. x + √y = 18 --> 16 + √4 = 16 + 2 = 18 (Correct!)
  2. √x + y = 8 --> √16 + 4 = 4 + 4 = 8 (Correct!)

Yay! Our solution checks out. We did it! We've successfully solved the system of equations. Checking our solution is a crucial step in the problem-solving process. It's like proofreading an essay before you submit it – you want to make sure you haven't made any careless errors. In math, checking your solution can help you catch mistakes that you might have made in your calculations or in your logic. It also gives you confidence that your answer is correct.

In this case, we needed to check our solution because we squared both sides of the equations earlier. Squaring both sides can sometimes introduce extraneous solutions, which are solutions that satisfy the transformed equation but not the original equation. By checking our solution in the original equations, we've made sure that we haven't fallen into this trap. The fact that our solution checks out in both equations gives us a high degree of confidence that it's correct. It's also a satisfying feeling to know that we've gone through the problem carefully and haven't missed anything.

Conclusion

Solving this system of equations was a journey, guys! We used a bunch of different techniques: isolating square roots, squaring both sides, substitution, and good old trial and error. The key takeaway here is that mathematical problem-solving isn't just about knowing formulas – it's about thinking strategically, understanding the problem, and using all the tools at your disposal. And, of course, checking your work is a must! We started with a problem that looked pretty intimidating, but by breaking it down into smaller steps and using a combination of algebraic and number-theoretic techniques, we were able to find the solution. The journey of solving a math problem is often as important as the solution itself. It's where we develop our problem-solving skills, learn new techniques, and gain a deeper understanding of mathematical concepts.

Remember, math isn't just about getting the right answer – it's about the process of getting there. It's about thinking critically, being persistent, and learning from your mistakes. Every problem is an opportunity to learn something new, and every solution is a victory to be celebrated. So, keep practicing, keep thinking, and keep exploring the wonderful world of mathematics! You guys got this!