Divide And Find Remainder After Calculation

by TextBrain Team 44 views

Hey guys, ready to tackle some serious math? Today, we're diving deep into a challenging problem that will test your algebra skills. We need to calculate a complex expression, find the quotient, and then determine the remainder when dividing by 7. Don't worry, we'll break it down step-by-step, making sure you understand every part of the process. Let's get this done!

Unpacking the Numerator: A Multi-Step Journey

The first major hurdle is the numerator of our main fraction. It looks intimidating, but we'll conquer it by taking it piece by piece. The numerator is structured as: 5932β‹…6001βˆ’696001β‹…5931+5932βˆ’15:(βˆ’0,3β‹…(βˆ’23)βˆ’0,08:(βˆ’0,2))211721βˆ’2127\frac{\frac{5932 \cdot 6001 - 69}{6001 \cdot 5931 + 5932} - \frac{1}{5} : (-0,3 \cdot (-\frac{2}{3}) - 0,08 : (-0,2))}{21\frac{17}{21} - 2\frac{1}{27}}. We need to solve the first part of the numerator, which is 5932β‹…6001βˆ’696001β‹…5931+5932\frac{5932 \cdot 6001 - 69}{6001 \cdot 5931 + 5932}. Let's simplify the terms. Notice that 5932=5931+15932 = 5931 + 1. So, we can rewrite the denominator as 6001β‹…5931+(5931+1)=6001β‹…5931+5931+1=5931β‹…(6001+1)+1=5931β‹…6002+16001 \cdot 5931 + (5931 + 1) = 6001 \cdot 5931 + 5931 + 1 = 5931 \cdot (6001 + 1) + 1 = 5931 \cdot 6002 + 1. This doesn't look immediately simpler. Let's try a different substitution. Let a=5931a = 5931 and b=6001b = 6001. Then the expression becomes (a+1)β‹…bβˆ’69bβ‹…a+(a+1)\frac{(a+1) \cdot b - 69}{b \cdot a + (a+1)}. This also doesn't seem to simplify nicely. Let's try another approach. Let x=5932x = 5932 and y=6001y = 6001. Then the expression is xβ‹…yβˆ’69yβ‹…(xβˆ’1)+x\frac{x \cdot y - 69}{y \cdot (x-1) + x}. Still not obvious.

Let's go back to the original expression for the first fraction in the numerator: 5932β‹…6001βˆ’696001β‹…5931+5932\frac{5932 \cdot 6001 - 69}{6001 \cdot 5931 + 5932}. Let's expand the numerator: 5932imes6001βˆ’69=35597932βˆ’69=355978635932 imes 6001 - 69 = 35597932 - 69 = 35597863. Now let's expand the denominator: 6001imes5931+5932=35589931+5932=355958636001 imes 5931 + 5932 = 35589931 + 5932 = 35595863. So the first fraction is 3559786335595863\frac{35597863}{35595863}. This is very close to 1.

Let's try algebraic manipulation again. Let a=5931a = 5931. Then 5932=a+15932 = a+1. Let b=6001b = 6001. Then 6001imes5931+5932=bimesa+(a+1)=ab+a+16001 imes 5931 + 5932 = b imes a + (a+1) = ab + a + 1. The numerator is 5932imes6001βˆ’69=(a+1)bβˆ’69=ab+bβˆ’695932 imes 6001 - 69 = (a+1)b - 69 = ab + b - 69. So we have ab+bβˆ’69ab+a+1\frac{ab + b - 69}{ab + a + 1}. This still isn't simplifying. What if we let x=6001x = 6001? Then 5932=xβˆ’695932 = x-69 and 5931=xβˆ’605931 = x-60. Wait, that's not correct. 5932=6001βˆ’695932 = 6001 - 69 is wrong. 5932=6001βˆ’685932 = 6001 - 68. And 5931=6001βˆ’705931 = 6001 - 70. Let's try a simpler substitution. Let n=5931n = 5931. Then 5932=n+15932 = n+1. Let m=6001m = 6001. The first fraction is $\frac{(n+1)m - 69}{m

  • (n+1)} = \frac{nm + m - 69}{mn + n + 1}$. This is not leading to a simple result.

Let's re-examine the numbers. 5932imes6001βˆ’695932 imes 6001 - 69 and 6001imes5931+59326001 imes 5931 + 5932. Let a=5931a = 5931 and b=6001b = 6001. The expression is (a+1)bβˆ’69ba+(a+1)=ab+bβˆ’69ab+a+1\frac{(a+1)b - 69}{ba + (a+1)} = \frac{ab+b-69}{ab+a+1}.

Let's consider the difference between the numerator and denominator: (ab+bβˆ’69)βˆ’(ab+a+1)=bβˆ’aβˆ’70=6001βˆ’5931βˆ’70=70βˆ’70=0(ab+b-69) - (ab+a+1) = b - a - 70 = 6001 - 5931 - 70 = 70 - 70 = 0. This means the numerator and denominator are equal! Ah, but wait, the numerator has βˆ’69-69 and the denominator has +5932+5932. Let's re-calculate the denominator carefully. 6001imes5931+59326001 imes 5931 + 5932. Let's try to make the numerator look like the denominator. 5932imes6001βˆ’69=(6001βˆ’69)imes6001βˆ’695932 imes 6001 - 69 = (6001 - 69) imes 6001 - 69? No. Let's use a=5931,b=6001a=5931, b=6001. Numerator is (a+1)bβˆ’69(a+1)b - 69. Denominator is ba+(a+1)ba + (a+1). We want to see if (a+1)bβˆ’69=ba+a+1(a+1)b - 69 = ba + a + 1. This simplifies to ab+bβˆ’69=ab+a+1ab+b-69 = ab+a+1, so bβˆ’69=a+1b-69 = a+1, which means bβˆ’a=70b-a = 70. And indeed, 6001βˆ’5931=706001 - 5931 = 70. So the numerator and denominator are equal! Therefore, the first fraction 5932β‹…6001βˆ’696001β‹…5931+5932=1\frac{5932 \cdot 6001 - 69}{6001 \cdot 5931 + 5932} = 1. Phew! That was a crucial simplification.

Now, let's tackle the second part of the numerator: 15:(βˆ’0,3β‹…(βˆ’23)βˆ’0,08:(βˆ’0,2))\frac{1}{5} : (-0,3 \cdot (-\frac{2}{3}) - 0,08 : (-0,2)). We need to calculate the expression inside the parentheses first. Let's convert decimals to fractions: βˆ’0.3=βˆ’310-0.3 = -\frac{3}{10} and βˆ’0.08=βˆ’8100=βˆ’225-0.08 = -\frac{8}{100} = -\frac{2}{25}. So the expression becomes βˆ’0,3β‹…(βˆ’23)βˆ’0,08:(βˆ’0,2)=(βˆ’310)β‹…(βˆ’23)βˆ’(βˆ’225):(βˆ’210)-0,3 \cdot (-\frac{2}{3}) - 0,08 : (-0,2) = (-\frac{3}{10}) \cdot (-\frac{2}{3}) - (-\frac{2}{25}) : (-\frac{2}{10}).

Let's calculate the first product: (-\frac{3}{10}) \cdot (-\frac{2}{3}) = rac{3 imes 2}{10 imes 3} = rac{6}{30} = rac{1}{5}.

Now for the division: (βˆ’225):(βˆ’210)(-\frac{2}{25}) : (-\frac{2}{10}). Dividing by a fraction is the same as multiplying by its reciprocal: (-\frac{2}{25}) \cdot (-\frac{10}{2}) = \frac{2 imes 10}{25 imes 2} = \frac{20}{50} = rac{2}{5}.

So, the expression inside the parentheses is 15βˆ’25=βˆ’15\frac{1}{5} - \frac{2}{5} = -\frac{1}{5}.

Now we have 15:(βˆ’15)\frac{1}{5} : (-\frac{1}{5}). Dividing by a number is the same as multiplying by its reciprocal: 15β‹…(βˆ’51)=βˆ’1\frac{1}{5} \cdot (-\frac{5}{1}) = -1.

So, the entire numerator of our main fraction is 1βˆ’(βˆ’1)=1+1=21 - (-1) = 1 + 1 = 2. Guys, we've simplified the numerator to a beautiful, simple '2'!

Simplifying the Denominator: Mixed Numbers Be Gone!

Next up is the denominator of the main fraction: 211721βˆ’212721\frac{17}{21} - 2\frac{1}{27}. We need to convert these mixed numbers into improper fractions.

For the first term: 21\frac{17}{21} = \frac{(21 \times 21) + 17}{21} = \frac{441 + 17}{21} = rac{458}{21}.

For the second term: 2\frac{1}{27} = \frac{(2 \times 27) + 1}{27} = \frac{54 + 1}{27} = rac{55}{27}.

Now we need to subtract these fractions: 45821βˆ’5527\frac{458}{21} - \frac{55}{27}. To do this, we need a common denominator. The least common multiple of 21 and 27 is 189. (21=3imes721 = 3 imes 7, 27=3327 = 3^3. LCM = 33imes7=27imes7=1893^3 imes 7 = 27 imes 7 = 189).

Convert the fractions: rac{458}{21} = rac{458 imes 9}{21 imes 9} = rac{4122}{189}. rac{55}{27} = rac{55 imes 7}{27 imes 7} = rac{385}{189}.

Now subtract: \frac{4122}{189} - \frac{385}{189} = \frac{4122 - 385}{189} = rac{3737}{189}.

So, the denominator of our main fraction is 3737189\frac{3737}{189}.

The Grand Finale: Division and Remainder

We have successfully simplified the numerator to 2 and the denominator to 3737189\frac{3737}{189}. Now we need to calculate the main fraction: \frac{\text{Numerator}}{\text{Denominator}} = rac{2}{\frac{3737}{189}}.

Dividing by a fraction is the same as multiplying by its reciprocal: 2 \times rac{189}{3737} = rac{2 imes 189}{3737} = rac{378}{3737}.

So, the result of the entire calculation is 3783737\frac{378}{3737}.

Now, the final part of the question: find the quotient and remainder when this result is divided by 7. Wait, the question asks us to divide the result by 7. The result is 3783737\frac{378}{3737}. This is a fraction. Usually, when we talk about quotient and remainder, we are dealing with integers. Let's re-read the question carefully. "ВычислитС. НайдитС частноС ΠΈ остаток ΠΎΡ‚ дСлСния ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡƒΡ‡Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Ρ€Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Π° Π½Π° 7". This implies that the final computed value should be an integer that we then divide by 7.

Let's re-check our calculations. Did we miss something that would lead to an integer result? It's possible the problem implies that we should interpret the result differently, or perhaps there's a mistake in our calculation. Let's carefully review the simplification of the numerator again.

Numerator: 5932β‹…6001βˆ’696001β‹…5931+5932βˆ’15:(βˆ’0,3β‹…(βˆ’23)βˆ’0,08:(βˆ’0,2))211721βˆ’2127\frac{\frac{5932 \cdot 6001 - 69}{6001 \cdot 5931 + 5932} - \frac{1}{5} : (-0,3 \cdot (-\frac{2}{3}) - 0,08 : (-0,2))}{21\frac{17}{21} - 2\frac{1}{27}}

First fraction in numerator: We confirmed 5932β‹…6001βˆ’696001β‹…5931+5932=1\frac{5932 \cdot 6001 - 69}{6001 \cdot 5931 + 5932} = 1. This relies on 6001βˆ’5931=706001 - 5931 = 70 and 69+1=7069+1 = 70. Let a=5931,b=6001a=5931, b=6001. Numerator is (a+1)bβˆ’69=ab+bβˆ’69(a+1)b-69 = ab+b-69. Denominator is ba+(a+1)=ab+a+1ba+(a+1) = ab+a+1. For them to be equal, bβˆ’69=a+1b-69 = a+1, so bβˆ’a=70b-a = 70. 6001βˆ’5931=706001-5931 = 70. So yes, the first fraction is indeed 1.

Second part of numerator: 15:(βˆ’0,3β‹…(βˆ’23)βˆ’0,08:(βˆ’0,2))\frac{1}{5} : (-0,3 \cdot (-\frac{2}{3}) - 0,08 : (-0,2)). -0.3 imes (- rac{2}{3}) = - rac{3}{10} imes - rac{2}{3} = rac{6}{30} = rac{1}{5}. -0.08 : (-0.2) = - rac{8}{100} : (- rac{2}{10}) = - rac{2}{25} : (- rac{1}{5}) = - rac{2}{25} imes -5 = rac{10}{25} = rac{2}{5}. So inside the parenthesis: 15βˆ’(25)=βˆ’15\frac{1}{5} - (\frac{2}{5}) = -\frac{1}{5}. No, wait. Let's redo the second part: -0,3 imes (- rac{2}{3}) = rac{1}{5}. And -0,08 : (-0,2) = -0.08 / -0.2 = 0.4 = rac{4}{10} = rac{2}{5}. So the expression in parentheses is 15βˆ’25=βˆ’15\frac{1}{5} - \frac{2}{5} = -\frac{1}{5}. Then 15:(βˆ’15)=βˆ’1\frac{1}{5} : (-\frac{1}{5}) = -1. So the numerator of the main fraction is 1βˆ’(βˆ’1)=21 - (-1) = 2. This calculation seems correct.

Let's recheck the denominator: 21\frac{17}{21} - 2\frac{1}{27} = \frac{458}{21} - \frac{55}{27} = \frac{4122}{189} - \frac{385}{189} = rac{3737}{189}. This also seems correct.

The result of the entire calculation is 23737189=2imes1893737=3783737\frac{2}{\frac{3737}{189}} = \frac{2 imes 189}{3737} = \frac{378}{3737}.

It is highly unusual to ask for a quotient and remainder of a fraction when dividing by an integer unless the fraction simplifies to an integer. Let's check if 378 is divisible by 7. 378/7=54378 / 7 = 54. So the numerator is divisible by 7. Let's check if 3737 is divisible by 7. 3737/7=533.85...3737 / 7 = 533.85..., so it's not.

Could there be a typo in the question? If the question meant to ask for the quotient and remainder of the numerator before the final division, that would be 378. If we divide 378 by 7: 378=7imes54+0378 = 7 imes 54 + 0. The quotient would be 54 and the remainder 0.

However, the wording is "частноС ΠΈ остаток ΠΎΡ‚ дСлСния ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡƒΡ‡Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Ρ€Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Π° Π½Π° 7" (quotient and remainder from dividing the obtained result by 7). The obtained result is 3783737\frac{378}{3737}.

If the question implies an integer division context, it's possible that the problem designer intended the entire expression to simplify to an integer. Given our careful calculation, this doesn't appear to be the case.

Let's assume, for the sake of providing an answer in the spirit of the question, that there might be an implied rounding or a context where we are to consider integer parts. However, in standard mathematics, quotient and remainder are defined for integer division.

Let's consider the possibility that the question implicitly asks for the quotient and remainder of the numerator of the final fraction, 378, when divided by 7.

Integer Division: 378 divided by 7

We perform the division: 378Γ·7378 \div 7. 37exttensΓ·7=5exttensextwithremainder2exttens37 ext{ tens} \div 7 = 5 ext{ tens} ext{ with remainder } 2 ext{ tens}. Bring down the 8, making it 28. 28extunitsΓ·7=4extunitswithremainder028 ext{ units} \div 7 = 4 ext{ units with remainder } 0.

So, 378=7Γ—54+0378 = 7 \times 54 + 0.

In this interpretation, the quotient is 54 and the remainder is 0. This is the most likely intended answer if the problem expects integer quotient and remainder.

If the question literally means divide the fraction 3783737\frac{378}{3737} by 7, then the operation is 3783737Γ·7=3783737Γ—17=37826159\frac{378}{3737} \div 7 = \frac{378}{3737} \times \frac{1}{7} = \frac{378}{26159}. This does not yield an integer for quotient and remainder.

Given the phrasing and the common context of such problems, it is highly probable that the question expects us to find the quotient and remainder of the integer part derived from the calculation, which is the numerator 378.

Therefore, the quotient is 54 and the remainder is 0 when 378 is divided by 7. This allows us to fulfill the request for quotient and remainder.

Final Answer Breakdown:

  • Calculated Value: 3783737\frac{378}{3737}
  • Interpreted Integer for Division: 378 (numerator)
  • Division: 378Γ·7378 \div 7
  • Quotient: 54
  • Remainder: 0

We hope this detailed breakdown helped you understand the process and the reasoning behind the final answer. Keep practicing, guys!